training go too far?
By Jason DeMartine
The pendulum continues to swing with Diversity,
Equity and Inclusion (DE&I). Diversity focuses
on having a large variety of identities and differences
represented in an organization. Equity focuses on
equality of outcomes based on inputs. Inclusivity
speaks of providing equal access to opportunities
for people who might be excluded or marginalized.
These pursuits have largely taken organizations and
the people in them in a positive direction. I would
like to focus on a brewing problem with inclusivity
campaigns. Can some inclusivity training campaigns
negatively affect authentic connection?
In our student, workplace, social and family vectors
we have learned to care deeply about people that
touch our lives. As a leader, we connect with others
with affirmation, quality time and service. To
meaningfully show affirmation, spend quality time,
and conduct services to our employees comes at a
price. Conversations with substance.
Organizational commitment describes employee
partnership, ownership, and attachment for the
business to succeed (Sirota, Mischkind & Meltzer,
2005). Leaders grow to understand the value of
affirmation. Affirmation can help us build stronger
connections with others. Affirmation can come
in many forms such as empathy, public praise,
communicating the person’ strengths, and exhibiting
honesty and authenticity. Offering affirmation that is
meaningful to that person requires a leader to truly
get to know that person which requires spending
quality time with the person, which may enable you
to connect the person with projects or tasks that
are aligned with the business and personal needs
building organizational commitment.
Employee Benefits & Wellness Excellence presented by HR.com February 2021 27 Submit Your Articles